How Former Critics of Andrew Cuomo are now Rallying Behind his Mayoral Campaign and why this Political Reversal Matters

In a dramatic twist that has caught the attention of New Yorkers and political pundits alike, several prominent politicians who once demanded Andrew Cuomo’s resignation as New York Governor are now actively endorsing him for New York City mayor. This reversal—an apparent pivot from outraged calls for accountability to enthusiastic support—raises pressing questions about political judgment, accountability, and the shifting dynamics of leadership in a city facing unprecedented challenges. This article unpacks the journey from condemnation to endorsement, highlighting key voices and their motivations as they navigate the complex landscape of New York politics.

The Background: Cuomo Under Fire and the Call for Resignation

In 2021, the political arena in New York was shaken by multiple sexual harassment allegations leveled against then-Governor Andrew Cuomo. A revealing report from the New York Attorney General substantiated these claims, igniting a firestorm of criticism. Prominent Democrats and other political figures decried Cuomo’s leadership, arguing that his behavior undermined public trust and the integrity of office.

Among those vocally demanding his resignation was Representative Gregory Meeks. He firmly stated at the time:

“The time has come for Governor Andrew Cuomo to do the right thing for the people of New York State and resign.”

Such statements resonated deeply across the state and were bolstered by others, including Representative Ritchie Torres and State Senator Jessica Ramos. Ramos’s social media outcry declared, “New Yorkers deserve better than a man who has played politics with our lives for a decade & couldn’t see beyond his ego.” These calls were seen as necessary steps respectively to champion accountability and protect the integrity of the #MeToo movement.

The Shift: From Resignation Demands to Mayoral Endorsements

A Surprising Political Pivot

Fast forward to 2025, and the political narrative around Andrew Cuomo has taken an unexpected turn. Figures who once decried his tenure now endorse his bid for the mayoralty of New York City, citing his extensive experience and crisis management abilities. This change of heart reflects both evolving political circumstances and a reassessment of what leadership qualities are most needed to steer New York through its current challenges.

Representative Ritchie Torres, previously a vocal critic, now offers a strong endorsement. He remarked:

“Cuomo is the clear choice to tackle the pressing issues facing New York City.”

This statement, echoed by other political figures, has prompted debate. Assemblywoman Rodneyse Bichotte Hermelyn, once relieved by the prospect of his resignation, now emphasizes his crisis management skills by stating, “Cuomo’s proven track record is exactly what New York City needs right now.”

Motivations Behind the Endorsements

Supporters of Cuomo argue that New York City is in dire need of stability amid escalating challenges including rising crime, housing shortages, and economic volatility. Their stance is rooted in a belief that experience, even when it comes intertwined with controversy, can be invaluable in turbulent times. State Senator Toby Ann Stavisky encapsulates this sentiment:

“We need someone with a proven ability to get things done. Cuomo has that record.”

They contend that in the face of urgent problems, the concrete skills honed over years in office outweigh past transgressions. This sentiment is bolstered by the belief that Cuomo’s familiarity with New York’s political landscape uniquely positions him to enact swift and decisive reforms.

Contending Perspectives and Political Calculations

Critics view these endorsements with deep skepticism. Many argue that the turnaround undermines the principles for which the earlier calls for resignation stood and may erode public trust in the Democratic Party’s commitment to accountability. Progressive activists caution that overlooking past misconduct in favor of political expediency could send a dangerous message regarding the standards to which elected officials are held.

Recent polling data reflects this split. A May 2025 survey indicates that while 48% of likely Democratic primary voters view Cuomo favorably, a nearly equivalent 44% maintain reservations given his troubled past. This polarized view underscores the delicate balance between valuing experience and demanding ethical conduct in leadership.

The Broader Impact: What This Means for New York City and Progressive Politics

Leadership in Times of Crisis

New York City stands at the crossroads of critical issues, and time is of the essence when it comes to implementing effective governance. Advocates for Cuomo’s mayoral run believe that his long tenure in public office, despite its controversies, equips him with the pragmatic skills required to address the city’s myriad challenges. His endorsement is seen as a vote for continuity, emphasizing a deep familiarity with state and city governance.

Political Memory and the Dynamics of Redemption

The transformation in sentiment concerning Cuomo also raises broader questions about political memory and redemption. The rapid pivot from demanding his resignation to endorsing him for mayor illustrates how shifting circumstances and perceived exigencies can lead to a re-evaluation of a leader’s legacy. This dynamic is emblematic of a broader trend in politics, where the electorate often grapples with reconciling a candidate’s past shortcomings with their current appeal and potential for future success.

Implications for the Future of Progressive Politics

For the center-left and progressives, the Cuomo debate serves as a cautionary tale. It highlights the inherent tension between upholding ethical standards and acknowledging the necessity of experienced leadership in times of crisis. As voters prepare for critical municipal elections, the decision on whether to support a controversial yet experienced candidate like Cuomo becomes emblematic of the broader ideological struggle within the Democratic Party.

The story of Andrew Cuomo’s political resurrection—from being a figure of widespread condemnation to becoming a potential mayoral candidate backed by former critics—underscores the complexities of leadership and accountability in modern politics. While his supporters emphasize the value of proven administrative experience in navigating crises, detractors warn that the shift may erode the hard-won gains of accountability movements like #MeToo.

As New Yorkers head to the polls, the decision they face is not simply about backing a candidate. It is a choice that reflects the evolving priorities of the electorate: balancing the need for experienced leadership with a commitment to ethical integrity. Engage in the conversation, scrutinize the facts, and cast your vote with a clear vision for a just and prosperous New York City.

Call to Action: Stay informed and actively participate in the democratic process. Your voice is vital in ensuring that leadership in New York remains both effective and principled. Share your thoughts and join the dialogue on our social platforms.